FeedExploreAsk AIAlertsSavedProfile

Categories

AICybersecurityInfrastructureDatabaseTech Updates

Tech news that matters.

FeedExploreAskAlertsSavedProfile
Back to feed
Cybersecurity·High

AI 'Power Users' Create Most Risk

AI 'Power Users' Create Most Risk

TL;DR: A new report from LayerX Security finds that enterprise AI risk is not evenly distributed. A small group of "power users" accounts for the majority of AI-related security exposure, highlighting a visibility gap for many organizations trying to manage their data and security policies effectively.

By Neeraj Dhiman·3h ago·1 min read·updated 1h ago
Source

Key facts

Category
Cybersecurity
Impact
High
Published
3h ago
Source
The Hacker News

Full summary

A new security report reveals that most enterprise AI risk comes from a small, active group of "power users," not the entire workforce.

A new report by LayerX Security reveals a critical insight into how AI tools introduce risk within businesses. The "State of AI Usage Report" finds that security exposure is not spread evenly among all employees. Instead, the vast majority of risk is concentrated within a small, specific group of "power users." These are individuals who engage with AI platforms far more frequently and intensively than their peers, making their activities the primary source of potential data leaks and compliance issues. This discovery challenges the common belief that AI risk is a widespread problem, indicating that many companies may not have a clear view of where their most significant vulnerabilities are located.

This finding is particularly important for CTOs, security leaders, and IT teams. It suggests that broad, uniform security policies for AI might be less effective than a more targeted strategy. By identifying and focusing on this small cohort of power users, organizations can apply more specific security controls, provide tailored training, and implement stricter data governance where it's most needed. This approach allows companies to direct their security resources more efficiently, reducing the overall risk profile without stifling innovation for the broader workforce. For business leaders, it offers a practical path to embracing AI's benefits while managing its inherent risks in a more focused and cost-effective manner.

Related on Notifire

  • ResearchKubernetes security
  • ResearchSupply-chain security
  • ResearchCritical CVEs of 2026
  • CompareSSO vs SCIM

✦ Notifire newsletter

Get more Cybersecurity intelligence

Join engineers getting Notifire’s verified tech briefings — short, sourced, and free. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

The day's most important tech briefings. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Related stories

Primary source: The Hacker News

Tech intelligence for engineering teams

Short, verified briefings on AI, cybersecurity, infrastructure, and data — with the analysis and action steps that matter. Every briefing is sourced, fact-checked, and bylined to a named editor.

[email protected]Story tips & corrections welcomeHow we report →

The Notifire briefing

Verified tech intelligence in your inbox — AI, security, infra, and data.

The day's most important tech briefings. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Sections

  • AI
  • Cybersecurity
  • Infrastructure
  • Database
  • Tech Updates
  • Web3 & Chains

Newsroom

  • About Notifire
  • Editorial team
  • Editorial standards
  • Methodology
  • AI disclosure
  • Corrections

Resources

  • Explore
  • Research hubs
  • Comparisons
  • Tech glossary
  • FAQ
  • Alerts & watchlists

Follow

  • RSS feed
© 2026 NotifirePrivacyTermsCorrections
An independent, AI-assisted publication. Built at </Alpheric>
IntelligenceLive panel
Live

Top trending

Last 24h

    Popular tags

    Add to watchlist

    +OpenAI+Claude+PostgreSQL+Kubernetes+Cloudflare+AWS+CVE Critical

    Notifire score

    0–100 priority signal — combines impact, freshness, trending velocity, and source credibility.

  1. Atom feed
  2. LinkedIn
  3. X / Twitter
  4. Facebook
  5. Instagram
  6. YouTube